Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and reaching treatment goals in youth seen in a preventive cardiology clinic.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of lipid-lowering therapy in reducing cardiovascular disease in adults is well-established. Unfortunately, it is also well-established that adults have inadequate adherence to lipid-lowering therapy, which is associated with increased costs and mortality. However, the adherence patterns of youth prescribed lipid-lowering therapy is not well-described. METHODS: We analyzed data that was prospectively collected from patients <27 years-old who were referred to a large regional preventive cardiology clinic from 2010 to 2017. Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy was self-reported at the patient's most recent clinic visit and categorized as either adequate adherence (≥80%) or inadequate adherence (<80%). We compared adherence rates by demographic factors, class of lipid-lowering therapy, length of time on lipid-lowering therapy, family history, lipid parameters, and laboratory measures of adverse effects. RESULTS: In our cohort, we had 318 patients prescribed a lipid-lowering medication over a seven-year period. Of those, 235 (75%) had adequate adherence. Those with adequate adherence had an improved LDL-C (123 mg/dL [standard deviation (SD) 32.3] vs. 167 mg/dL [SD 50.4], p < 0.05), total cholesterol (198 mg/dL [49.5] vs. 239 mg/dL [SD 53.2]), and non-HDL-C (148 mg/dL [SD 38.7] vs. 193 mg/dL [SD 43.9]). In addition, patients with adequate adherence were more likely to reach goal LDL-C of <130 mg/dL than those with inadequate adherence (130 vs. 25, p < 0.01). The relationship between LDL-C and adherence remained statistically significant after controlling for age, gender, and the length of time on therapy (ß = -0.66, p < 0.01). Adherence level did not differ by gender, class of lipid-lowering therapy, length of time on lipid-lowering therapy, or presence of a family history of an atherosclerotic event. The findings were similar when we only analyzed those prescribed a statin. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in youth is excellent and was associated with achieving goal LDL-C goals. Obtaining adherence data from patients may help more patients reach LDL-C goals.

The relationship between payer type and lipid outcomes in response to clinical lifestyle interventions in youth with dyslipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Payer-type (government-sponsored health coverage versus private health insurance) has been shown to influence a variety of cardiovascular disease outcomes in adults. However, it is unclear if the payer-type impacts the response to a lifestyle intervention in children with dyslipidemia. METHODS: We analyzed data prospectively collected from patients under the age of 25 years who were referred to a large regional preventive cardiology clinic from 2010 to 2016 in Massachusetts. We compared baseline high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), non-HDL-C, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by payer-type. Further, we analyzed the change in lipid values in response to a clinic-based multidisciplinary intervention over a nearly six-year period by payer-type with multi-variable adjusted linear regression models. We also tested for effect modifications by age, sex, race, and body mass index (BMI) category. RESULTS: Of the 1739 eligible patients (mean age 13 years, 52% female, 60% overweight and obese, 59% White), we found that patients with government-sponsored coverage (n = 354, 20%) presented to referral lipid clinic with lower HDL-C (- 3.5 mg/dL [1.0], p < 0.001) and higher natural log-transformed TG (+ 0.14 [0.04], p < 0.001) as compared to those with private insurance; however, the association was attenuated to the null after additionally adjusting for BMI category (- 1.1 [0.9], p = 0.13, and + 0.05 [0.04], p = 0.2 for HDL-C and natural log-transformed TG, respectively). We found no difference in baseline LDL-C between payer-types (+ 3.4 mg/dL [3.0], p = 0.3). However, longitudinally, we found patients with private insurance and a self-reported race of White to have a clinically meaningful additional improvement in LDL-C, decreasing 12.8 (5.5) mg/dL (p = 0.02) between baseline and first follow-up, as compared to White patients with government-sponsored health coverage, after adjusting for age, sex, time between visits, and baseline LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that youth with government-sponsored coverage are referred with poorer lipid profiles than those with private insurance, although this is largely explained by higher rates of overweight and obesity in the government-sponsored health coverage group. White patients with private insurance had substantially better improvement in LDL-C longitudinally, suggesting that higher socioeconomic status facilitates improvement in LDL-C, but is less beneficial for HDL-C and triglyceride levels.